Written
by
Ty Narada for Dr. Kosso
Piccione claims that Egyptian women
seem to
have enjoyed the same legal and economic rights as an Egyptian man.
This
notion is reflected in Egyptian art and historical inscriptions.
Women’s
rights were inherently connected to the theoretical role of the king in
Egyptian society. Since the pharaoh personified Egypt, he emulated the
social regimen and vicarious personality of the State. In that light,
men and women are determined to be socially equal. (Piccione) All
people sharing a common relationship with the king compose Egyptian
national identity. Men and women evidently shared equally, so it
appears that they were equal to each other. (Piccione)
Egypt was not an egalitarian
society. (Piccione) Social distinction is viewed in terms of class
rather than gender. Rights and privileges varied from class to class
but equal economic and legal rights were afforded without gender bias.
Most of the text and images that Piccione observed were found in the
tombs of affluent Egyptians. He claims that commoners were not well
represented due to insufficient funds. (Piccione)
Based on recovered legal documents,
Egyptian women were accorded equal rights: They bought and sold private
property,
materials, servants/slaves and animals. The recovered legal documents
indicate
that women contracted in marriage and divorce. She could free slaves,
make
adoptions and execute testaments. Greek women required a male advocate
(Kourios) in all legal predicaments. Egyptian women did not. (Piccione)
A man’s customary responsibility was
to assure the security of his mother, wife and daughters. He did this
by giving them property from which they could earn an income. (Ward)
Ward claims that there were no marriage certificates or accounts of
formal marriage ceremonies. Marriage was based on property agreements
between the bride and groom’s respective families. The husband was
expected to supply a house and any existing (or expected) inheritance
from his parents. The wife’s family supplied her with a dowry that may
have consisted of liquid assets, real property and portable wealth. The
wealthier the family, the more extensive the dowry. (Ward)
An imyt-pr was the
equivalent of a ‘living will.’ Records show that men more often created
imyt-prs to short-circuit the custom of dividing his property equally
among his survivors. The imyt-pr could specify property owned prior to
marriage. Marriage, according to custom, created a limited
community-property union: Only property accrued during
a marriage's tenure was dissolvable after death. Property owned prior
to
marriage was not community property. (Piccione) A more radical
provision
allowed the husband to ‘adopt’ his wife, making her a legal child.
Egyptian
custom specified that 1/3 of a man’s property go to his wife and the
remaining
2/3rds be evenly divided among his children. By adopting his wife, he
could
effectively make her his sole heir. It is important to note that gender
distinction
was made regarding real estate. Creating an imyt-pr could include
property
owned prior to the marriage; awarding her a fee simple estate (the
whole
thing). (Piccione)
"Women were clearly able to
challenge the provisions of a will." (Ward) Women were free to
distribute property according to their desires unless a provision in
her husband’s will prevented it: A will was binding. Piccione cites a
papyrus that describes a case in point: A childless woman inherited her
husband's estate. She raised three children that her
husband sired with the female household slave. Piccione says that such
liaisons
were common. She asked her oldest stepdaughter to marry her younger
brother.
She adopted her younger brother to make him her son. Her son [brother,
formerly] and daughter-in-law [stepdaughter, formerly], became the sole
heirs of the estate. Circumnavigating customary function was possible
if you knew how. (Narada) The ability to enjoin heirs and disinherit
them could be accomplished with equal finesse. According to Piccione,
disinheriting an heir was a simple matter of selectively excluding them
according to the owner’s conscious.
The Will of Naunakht (Naunakht) can provide a more thorough exploration
of
the mechanics of property distribution. (Piccione)
Piccione describes records of women
making arrangements for self-enslavement (indentured servitude) usually
as payment to a creditor to satisfy bad debts. The horror of such
arrangement is that the woman could also indenture her children and
grandchildren in the contract. In the words of one woman who bound
herself to the temple of Saknebtynis: "The ‘female servant’ has said
before my master, Saknebtynis, the great god, 'I am your servant,
together with my children and my children's children. I shall not be
free in your precinct forever and ever. You will protect me; you will
keep me safe; you will guard me. You will keep me sound; you will
protect
me from every demon, and I will pay you 1-1/4 kita of copper . . .
until
the completion of 99 years, and I will give it to your priests
monthly."
(Piccione). The 99-year stipulation was the loophole in what otherwise
would
have been an illegal contract. (Piccione) The quote itself is a good
sample
of one woman’s convictions and priorities.
Egyptian women had the right to
bring lawsuits against anyone in open court and women won many legal
cases without gender-bias. (Piccione) Women could institute litigation,
appeal to the Vizier Court, be awarded legal decisions and have
decisions reversed on appeal. Women were acceptable witnesses at a
trial without gender-bias. (Piccione) Baines and Eyre suggest that
lower class women were illiterate; less than 1 in 30 women had any
education at all. (Piccione) Middle class women and the wives of
professional men were slightly more educated. The upper class had a
higher
literacy rate among women. The assumption is based on textual and
archaeological
records that mention administrative titles that imply literate ability.
(Piccione)
According to Ward, "There does not
seem to be [evident] societal barriers excluding women from
professional life but there is insufficient documentation." (Ward)
According to Piccione, royal princesses had private tutors at court
that taught them to read and write. Piccione
refers to a female physician: As a prerequisite to medical school, she
would
have had to qualify as a scribe. (Piccione) Egyptian women were free to
appear in public without inhibition. It was unsafe for an Egyptian
woman to travel abroad until Ramesses III said (in one inscription), "I
enabled the woman of Egypt to go her own way, her journeys being
extended where she wanted, without any person assaulting her on the
road." (Piccione) Piccione described Ramesses quote as a ‘boast’ for
which Ramesses must have perceived himself as an enlightened
administrator of justice. Piccione said that in spite of
Ramesses boast, Egyptian custom still kept women from traveling alone,
and
those who did were pursued as whores.
According to Piccione, textual
sources reveal upper class woman holding real office jobs. Piccione
cites Nebet (6th Dynasty) entitled, "Vizier, Judge and
Magistrate." Nebet was the wife of King Coptos and grandmother of King
Pepi I. Piccione does not know if the title was granted posthumously.
Another woman was entitled, "Second Prophet (i.e. High Priest) of Amun"
at the temple of Karnak. Piccione says that the ‘Second Prophet’ would
normally have been officiated by a male. Some women became national
heroines: Queen Ahhotep (18th Dynasty), was regarded for
saving Egypt during the wars of liberation against the Hyksos. She
rallied Egyptian forces and crushed rebel troops in Upper Egypt at a
crucial epoch in Egyptian history. She received the Order of the Fly,
Egypt’s highest
military decoration, on three separate occasions. There were some
notable
women criminals too: Tomb robbers, adulteresses, imprisoned convicts
and
masterminds of crime. Piccione cites Nesmut who was implicated in a
series
of royal tomb robberies in the Valley of the Kings as his chief example
(12th Dynasty).
Artistic renderings reveal men
plowing the fields, milking the cows, and doing the laundry. (Ward)
Women worked inside or under garden shade. Because men were always
outside, they are portrayed in red
or brown colors where women always appear white or yellow. (Kosso,
Ward)
The men are sunburned; the women are not. Scenes with religious motifs
far
outnumber those portraying daily life (Ward) unlike the Minoans who
created
art with common everyday themes purely for enjoyment.
The realm of men included
government, civil
service, the military, trades and professions. A woman's domain was in
private
life that Ward attributes to social custom more than official doctrine.
According to Ward, it was essential in that an Egyptian wife create a
home, care for the children, and run the household. This meant a
considerable workload
for middle and upper income households. Ward says that large households
had scores of servants in weaving workshops, large complicated
kitchens,
separate food preparation and storage areas, tailors and gardeners to
name
a few. The wife was the principal overseer of all domestic activity and
general manager of the family and servants. With the exception of
language
and cultural aesthetics, Minoan women seem strikingly similar to
Egyptian
women where the Greeks, due to their expansionist policies, kept women
under
tighter, more sedated and less liberated conditions.
Bibliography
1. Dr. Cynthia K.
Kosso, Professor of History, Northern Arizona University, class lectures
2. Will of Naunakht
http://www.library.nwu/class/history/B94/naunakht.html
3. Peter A. Piccione, http://www.library.nwu.edu/class/history/B94/B94women.html
4. William A. Ward, http://www.uky.edu/AS/Classics/wardlect.html
5. Department of
Egyptology,
Brown University (NEH Lecture, Brown University, 21 June, 1995)
|