About Us
American Interests
Arizona Regional
Biocybergenics
7-Gates University
Free Stuff - E-groups
Home
Hydronetics
Internet Investigations
Naradamotive
Psionic Guards
Site Search
Social Unrest
Universal Wholesale
Webmaster's Lounge
1804 Sioux
1920's -- 40's
Ancient Sex
Arizona History
Cosmetics History
Egyptian Women
Heroine Cults
Holocaust
HOME
Minoan Women
Scarlett Letter
Slaves or Politics
The Third Reich
Vietnam
Women Dreaming
Future Perfect
THE ROLE OF ZIONISM
 IN THE HOLOCAUST

by Rabbi Gedalya Liebermann - Australia


Education

Film-Theatre

Finance

Food

History

Humanity

Humor-Psyche

Music

Philosophy

Publishing

Services

Sociology

It is common knowledge that all the sages and saints in Europe at the time of Hitler's rise declared that he was a messenger of divine wrath, sent to chasten the Jews because of the bitter apostasy of Zionism against the belief in the eventual messianic redemption.

Zionist leaders made a point of displaying abysmal contempt for their Jewish brothers and sisters by actively participating in their extermination.  Zionists were the "statesmen" who organized the irresponsible boycott against Germany in 1933.  Although the boycott had a negligable effect on the German economy, the idea that Zionists would resort to such tactics infuriated Hitler.

President Roosevelt convened the Evian conference July 6-15 1938, to create a sanctuary for German and Austrian Jews.  The Jewish Agency delegation headed by Golda Meir (Meirson) ignored the offer by President Roosevelt and similar offers by 32 other countries willing to accept German and Austrian Jews.  At that time, Germany offered to issue exit permits for $250 a head.  The Zionists were not compelled to act, seeming almost catatonic.

On Feb 1, 1940 Henry Montor executive vice-President of the United Jewish Appeal refused to intervene for a shipload of Jewish refugees stranded on the Danube river, stating that "Palestine cannot be flooded with... old people or with undesirables."

The German Gestapo in 1941 and again in 1942, offered all European Jews transit to Spain if they would abandon their property in Germany and Occupied France.  There three conditions: 1. Deportees could not travel from Spain to Palestine per agreement between the Gestapo and the Mufti.  2. Deportees could travel to the US or the UK to remain permanently.  3. A $1,000 ransom would be paid at the Spanish border for each family and the rate of 1,000 families daily.

The Zionist response was: 1. Palestine is the ONLY acceptable destination for deportees. 2. NO ransom will be paid of any kind.  3. In order to compel the Allies to construct a Jewish State, Jews must suffer and die in record numbers.

The Zionists responded to the Gestapo knowing that the only alternative was the gas chamber.

During the 1944 Hungarian deportations, the same offer to salvage Hungarian Jewery was made by the Gestapo and again the Zionists refused.

The British government granted visas to 300 rabbis and their families to the Colony of Mauritius.  Assuming that this was a plot to undermine Jewish immigration to Palestine, Zionists informed the Gestapo, who in turn, intercepted the 300 rabbis and their familes and sent them to concentration camps where they were gassed.

On December 17, 1942 both houses of the British Parliament declared its readiness to find temporary refuge for endangered persons. The British Parliament proposed to evacuate 500,000 Jews from Europe, and resettle them in British colonies, as a part of diplomatic negotiations with Germany. This motion received within two weeks a total of 277 Parliamentary signatures. On Jan. 27, when the next steps were being pursued by over 100 M.P.'s and Lords, a spokesman for the Zionists announced that the Jews would oppose the motion because Palestine was omitted.

On Feb. 16, 1943 Roumania offered 70,000 Jewish refugees of the Trans-Dniestria to leave at the cost of $50 each. This was publicized in the New York papers. Yitzhak Greenbaum, Chairman of the Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency, addressing the Zionist Executive Council in Tel Aviv Feb. 18 1943 said, "when they asked me, "couldn't you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said NO! and I say again, NO!...one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance." On Feb. 24, 1943 Stephen Wise, President of the American Jewish Congress and leader of the American Zionists issued a public refusal to this offer and declared no collection of funds would seem justified. In 1944, the Emergency Committee to Save the Jewish People called upon the American government to establish a War Refugee Board. Stephen Wise testifying before a special committee of Congress objected to this proposal.

During the course of the negotiations mentioned above, Chaim Weizman, the first "Jewish statesman" stated: "The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestine are not too important". Weizman's cohort, Greenbaum, amplified this statement with the observation "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe".

And then, after the bitterest episode in Jewish history, these Zionist "statesmen" lured the broken refugees in the DP camps to remain in hunger and deprivation, and to refuse relocation to any place but Palestine; only for the purpose of building their State.

In 1947 Congressman William Stration sponsored a bill to immediately grant entry to the United States of 400,000 displaced persons. The bill was not passed after it was publicly denounced by the Zionist leadership.

These facts are read with consternation and unbearable shame. How can it be explained that at a time during the last phase of the war, when the Nazis were willing to barter Jews for money, partly because of their desires to establish contact with the Western powers which, they believed, were under Jewish influence, how was it possible one asks that the self-proclaimed "Jewish leaders" did not move heaven and earth to save the last remnant of their brothers?

On Feb. 23, 1956 the Hon. J. W. Pickersgill, Minister for Immigration was asked in the Canadian House of Commons "would he open the doors of Canada to Jewish refugees". He replied "the government has made no progress in that direction because the government of Israel....does not wish us to do so".

In 1972, the Zionist leadership successfully opposed an effort in the United States Congress to allow 20,000-30,000 Russian refugees to enter the United States. Jewish relief organizations, Joint and HIAS, were being pressured to abandon these refugees in Vienna, Rome and other Europiean cities.  The pattern is clear!!! Humanitarian rescue efforts are subverted to narrow Zionist interests.

Zionist responsibility for the Holocaust is threefold.

1.The Holocaust was a punishment for disrespecting The Three Oaths (see Talmud, Tractate Kesubos p. 111a).

2.Zionist leaders openly withheld support, both financially and otherwise, to save their fellow brothers and sisters from a cruel death.

3.The leaders of the Zionist movement cooperated with Hitler and his cohorts on many occasions and in many ways.

Zionists Offer a Military Alliance with Hitler

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letter for its name, "Tel Aviv", while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party (Nazi) member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity". Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich. In early January 1941 a small but important Zionist organization submitted a formal proposal to German diplomats in Beirut for a military-political alliance with wartime Germany. The offer was made by the radical underground "Fighters for the Freedom of Israel", better known as the Lehi or Stern Gang. Its leader, Avraham Stern, had recently broken with the radical nationalist "National Military Organization" (Irgun Zvai Leumi - Etzel) over the group's attitude toward Britain, which had effectively banned further Jewish settlement of Palestine. Stern regarded Britain as the main enemy of Zionism.

This remarkable proposal "for the solution of the Jewish question in Europe and the active participation on the NMO [Lehi] in the war on the side of Germany" is worth quoting at some length:

"The NMO which is very familiar with the goodwill of the German Reich government and its officials towards Zionist activities within Germany and the Zionist emigration program takes the view that: 1.Common interests can exist between a European New Order based on the German concept and the true national aspirations of the Jewish people as embodied by the NMO.  2.Cooperation is possible between the New Germany and a renewed, folkish-national Jewry. 3.The establishment of the Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, and bound by treaty, with the German Reich, would be in the interest of maintaining and strengthening the future German position of power in the Near East.

"On the basis of these considerations, and upon the condition that the German Reich government recognize the national aspirations of the Israel Freedom Movement mentioned above, the NMO in Palestine offers to actively take part in the war on the side of Germany.

"This offer by the NMO could include military, political and informational activity within Palestine and, after certain organizational measures, outside as well. Along with this the "Jewish" men of Europe would be militarily trained and organized in military units under the leadership and command of the NMO. They would take part in combat operations for the purpose of conquering Palestine, should such a front be formed.

"The indirect participation of the Israel Freedom Movement in the New Order of Europe, already in the preparatory stage, combined with a positive-radical solution of the European-Jewish problem on the basis of the national aspirations of the Jewish people mentioned above, would greatly strengthen the moral foundation of the New Order in the eyes of all humanity.

"The cooperation of the Israel Freedom Movement would also be consistent with a recent speech by the German Reich Chancellor, in which Hitler stressed that he would utilize any combination and coalition in order to isolate and defeat England". (Original document in German Auswertiges Amt Archiv, Bestand 47-59, E224152 and E234155-58. Complete original text published in: David Yisraeli, The Palestinian Problem in German Politics 1889-1945 (Israel: 1947) pp. 315-317).

And now look at non-Zionists who also called for collaboration with Hitler and read it with "Adolf Hitler Founder of Israel" by Hennecke Kardel, Switzerland 1974 and USA 1997 combined:  "A Program For The Jews by Rabbi Harry Waton, New York, 1939 of which the purpose was to convince Hitler that in his best interest is to cooperate with Jews for the common good of mankind. The Rabbi said: "When the Jews declared war against Germany (1934) I saw that that was a suicidal policy.